Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Battletech - Tanks Set 1 WIP 1 by Amuscaria Battletech - Tanks Set 1 WIP 1 by Amuscaria
Here are some tanks I've completed for Battletech and battletech-related stuff recently relatively recently.

Gurteltier 3085: One of the 2 pieces I did for the TRO 3085 earlier this year, and the 3rd tank I've drawn thus far. This is a giant 100-ton tonner with a Gauss Rifle, a ER PPC, a MML-7, and 3 LMGs.

Tomahawk 3063: This was recycled from an abandoned tank drawing for ~Centurion13's TRO 3063, with some small design changes. This is a 60-ton tank with a LB-10x, a UAC-5, and an AMS.

Revenant 3063: Another one of the recycled drawings I did for the 3063 TRO. This is a 65-tonner with a Gauss Rifle, a ER Medium laser, and an AMS.

More tanks and armored vehicles to come in time.
Designs (c) their respective owners
Art by me.
Add a Comment:

The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork

Please sign up or login to post a critique.

PedroPortela Featured By Owner Sep 2, 2013
Love it! As an ex-tanker i would love to drive one of these look and "feel" realistic.
S7alker117 Featured By Owner Jan 7, 2011  Professional Writer
Amazing stuff, as usual!

Instant fav :)
Nebfer Featured By Owner Jan 6, 2011
Well no B-tech vehicle level munition weighs in at 10 metric tons (out side of capital scale weapons -Warships), a number of weapons systems weight that much, the rounds not to much. The heaviest rounds are the Class 20 autocannons with consume 200 kilograms worth of ammo per "shot" (the guns are typically fluffed to be 100 to 200 mm in caliber) and A Heavy Gauss Rifle which flings a 250 kilogram slug at hypersonic velocity's (over mach 5 or 1,710m/s). B-tech weapons do seem to fling their projectiles at much higher velocity's than their real life counter parts.

Some ammo mass weight per shot (with a rough size of the shell based on historical naval ammo weights and other weapons)
Light Gauss Rifle = 62.5kg per shot (roughly 6.75 inch)
Gauss rifle = 125kg (roughly a eight inch naval shell)
Heavy Gauss rifle = 250kg (roughly 10.5 inch)

Machinegun = 5kg (Canonically 12.7 to 30mm)
Autocannon-2s = 22.2kg (Canonically 20 to 50mm)
Autocannon-5s = 50kg (Canonically 40 to 80mm, though 105, 110 and 120mm are also noted calibers)
Autocannon-10s = 100kg (Canonically 75 to 100mm)
Autocannon-20s = 200kg (Canonically 100 to 203mm)
Note: Autocannons fire multiple rounds per shot

LRMs = 8.3kg (heavier than the unguided shoulder fired infantry AT weapons but a lighter than the Guided ones)
SRMs = 10kg (same as above)
ATMs = 16.6kg (Heavier than the shoulder fired AT weapons, but a bit lighter than the vehicle mounted ones like the TOE)
MRMs = 4.16kg (in the same range as most of the unguided AT rockets like the RPG and AT-4)

Sniper Artillery = 50kg (roughly in line with a 5.1 inch shell)
Thumper Artillery = 100kg (roughly in line with 6.75 inch shell, The gun weight also happens to be inline with historical guns of this caliber)
Long Tom Artillery = 200kg (roughly in line with a 9.4 inch shell -also the gun is in the same weight range of guns of this type)
Arrow IV = 200kg (A bit smaller than a Maverick missile)

Thunderbolt missiles 83 to 333kgs (varys on the missile type but the two heavier ones are in the same range as a Maverick missile)
Light Air to Air missile = ~500kg (heavier than the AIM-54 Phoenix missile of F-14 fame)
Air To Air Arrow = 1,000kg
Air Dropped Bombs = 1,000kg
RBL-M1A2Tanker Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010
Hehe, from a technical/mechanical stanpoint, the second tank just doesn't work. Mostly because the smaller barrel on top can't fire properly due to it being connected to the larger barrel below it.

Granted, this is Battletech, so it could easily be an ER Laser or a PPC, so that nullifies what I said above. If they were autocannons or other large caliber ballistic weapons, then it holds true.
Amuscaria Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
Nothing in Battletech would work in real life, from the missiles, to the lasers, to the PPCs.
RBL-M1A2Tanker Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010
This is very true. Does make it rather fun though. :D

The autocannons would work at least. Not so much the Gauss rifles though.
Amuscaria Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
I dunno, I don't even think some of the A/Cs would work, given their diameter is bigger than their barrel-length. :P
RBL-M1A2Tanker Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010
Sure they could. You make the chassis bigger to accommodate the weapon system used, either to handle the recoil better, or just to distribute the weight more efficiently.

Granted, I think it'd be crazy to do it, but you COULD do it lol
Amuscaria Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
With no barrel, the round would just drop out of the cannon. That and the round itself would be 10 tons a piece and would go like 50 feet (then again, that's about the range of the big BT weapons, lol).
RBL-M1A2Tanker Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010
Wait, 10 tons apiece? How the hell do mechs carry several rounds of those things then if they increase the weight of the machine several times?

Damn you reality and physics trying to intrude on game logic!
Amuscaria Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
I'd pretty much stop bothering with the physics when I draw mechs these days. Cuz they can only crumble in real life. :P
(2 Replies)
arkadeTDG Featured By Owner Dec 20, 2010  Professional Traditional Artist
really good design on those tanks..cant wait to see it finished..
Crimson-Revelation Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
omg ur stuff is so great >,< lol :heart:
Steel-Raven Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2010  Professional Traditional Artist
Amazing stuff, I love the look of the Revenant.
Aerzaal Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
With tanks like that, who'd drive a 'Mech? Smaller profile means they're harder to hit (as if that's really a factor with FCS and TAG), but being lower to the ground means you gotta get closer to hit them. They don't show up for miles around like a 'Mech, which also means they can actually use the terrain for cover. They're also much more stable. That counts for a lot, if you've ever seen an Atlas toppled by a good Large Guass shot, you know what I mean.

As cool as 'Mechs are, these babies provide a convincing argument for conventional armor. Nice designs.
KririosYorandros Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2010
your tanks is great..... but maybe (is only my opinion) they are "classic" (a tank with a machine gun and a cannon you find anywhere)... why don't you try to make one with a little rocket launcher on the back or an over-tank (a tank like an overcraft)... besides this you'are a dragon (a my way to told someone that is a legend for me)
BaronTopherVonPanda Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2010  Hobbyist Writer
All very cool. And being an Armor officer I greatly appreciate these :)
While I like the Gurteltier the most, the Tomahak's turret reminds me somewhat of an Abrams' turret :) plus the LB-10X and UAC-5 is just a mean combo for an affordable price :D
Centurion13 Featured By Owner Dec 25, 2010
I patterned the Tomahawk warload after an old .22 cal/.410 shotgun, a Savage over and under, that my Dad got when he was 14. Figured it might be a good idea on a tank, too. Imagine my surprise when Eric came up with the design you see above. Perfect! :)
Add a Comment:


Submitted on
December 18, 2010
Image Size
277 KB


5,594 (3 today)
122 (who?)